Friday, February 26, 2021

Tandav makers can approach HCs for relief: SC

Must Read

Iraq’s scattered Christians ask ‘should I stay or go?’ as their struggles persist

A jihadist message, "Islamic State endures", is still graffitied on the front gate of Thanoun Yahya, an Iraqi Christian...

Novel chip for Covid-19 testing delivers results on smartphone

Scientists have developed a stamp-sized chip that simplifies Covid-19 testing, and delivers results on a smartphone in less than...

United States asks Pakistan to play a ‘constructive role’ in the region

The United States on Thursday called upon Pakistan to play a “constructive role” in the region, especially across the...

  • The top court agreed to modify its Wednesday’s order to clarify that the petitions were dismissed only under Article 32 (for violation of fundamental rights) and not on merits.
By HT Correspondent, SNN, New Delhi

PUBLISHED ON JAN 29, 2021 05:13 AM IST

HTThe Supreme Court on Thursday clarified that its refusal to quash the seven FIRs lodged against the actors and makers of web series Tandav, and streaming platform Amazon Prime’s head across the country, for allegedly hurting religious sentiments, will not come in the way of their approaching the respective high courts for relief.

Following a request by senior advocate Sidharth Luthra, the top court agreed to modify its Wednesday’s order to clarify that the petitions were dismissed only under Article 32 (for violation of fundamental rights) and not on merits.

Luthra was appearing for Tandav director Ali Abbas Zafar, producer Himanshu Kishan Mehra and writer Gaurav Solanki.

On Wednesday, a bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan had declined to grant interim protection from arrest to Luthra’s clients, besides Bollywood actor Zeeshan Ayyub and Amazon Prime (India) creative head Aparna Purohit. The top court had said that all of them may seek bail from courts concerned in the FIRs lodged in connection with the web series.

Luthra said that had the bench not mentioned that the dismissal of the plea was only under Article 32, the petitioners would not be able to secure relief from any high court in the country.

“Which high court will entertain our petitions either under Article 226 (a writ petition) or under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (quashing of FIRs) if this court doesn’t clarify that our petitions were not entertained under Article 32 and not otherwise? If the clarification doesn’t come through, our reliefs will be foreclosed,” Luthra submitted before the bench, which also included justices R Subhash Reddy and MR Shah.



Follow @ Facebook

Follow @ Twitter

Follow @ Telegram

Updates on Whatsapp – Coming Soon

Latest News

Hrithik Roshan to record statement against Kangana Ranaut tomorrow

Hrithik Roshan will have to appear before the Mumbai crime branch on Saturday to record his statement in a...

Zareen Khan on how Katrina Kaif comparisons and body shaming affected her | एक्ट्रेस ने कहा, ‘कटरीना कैफ से तुलना ने करियर बर्बाद कर...

Ads से है परेशान? बिना Ads खबरों के लिए इनस्टॉल करें Smart Newsline ऐप2010 में फिल्म 'वीर' के जरिए सलमान खान के साथ ड्रीम...

Roohi song Kiston: Rajkummar Rao can’t help falling for Janhvi Kapoor after abducting her

The second song from Roohi shows Rajkummar Rao's Bhawra slowly falling in love with Janhvi Kapoor's character after abducts her. PUBLISHED ON FEB 26, 2021...

Kangana Ranaut drags Alia bhatt, Taapsee Pannu after not getting tagged in Tanu Weds Manu anniversary posts while Swara Bhasker did | कंगना ने...

Hindi NewsEntertainmentBollywoodKangana Ranaut Drags Alia Bhatt, Taapsee Pannu After Not Getting Tagged In Tanu Weds Manu Anniversary Posts While Swara Bhasker DidAds से है...

Shahid Kapoor and Misha are cutest dad-daughter duo in these photos

A photographer shared beautiful pictures of Shahid Kapoor and his daughter Misha on actor's 40th birthday on Thursday. Check them out here. PUBLISHED ON FEB...

More Articles Like This